This article was updated April 2026
Nicklin MP Marty Hunt is seeking community input on pedestrian safety improvements in Mapleton, and he wants to hear from as many residents as possible. It is a reasonable initiative. But as with most infrastructure decisions, the answer is more complicated than a simple yes or no. Before you fill in the survey, here is what you should consider.
A Long-Running Conversation
The push for improved pedestrian infrastructure on Obi Obi Road is not new. It has surfaced repeatedly in Mapleton and District Community Association (MADCA) discussions, community forums, and council engagement sessions for at least a decade. Past requests have included a roundabout at the K-intersection of Flaxton Drive, Post Office Road, and Obi Obi Road, ultimately deemed infeasible due to topography and cost, and a pedestrian bridge over Flaxton Drive near the school, which has never been funded.
MADCA’s own records document the long-running concern about speed and pedestrian safety through the village centre. The association formalised these concerns in 2022, when MADCA engaged with then-local MP Rob Skelton over streetscape and speed limit issues. This led to a petition attracting over 650 signatures, and ultimately to the permanent 40km/h speed limit through the village centre, implemented in June 2023.
At the time, the 40km/h limit was widely regarded as a meaningful safety improvement, and a pragmatic alternative to physical infrastructure that TMR had consistently declined to fund. Now, in 2026, the conversation has reopened.
Marty Hunt is candid about what this survey is trying to do. “Every response helps us better understand how people are using Obi Obi Road in Mapleton and where improvements may be needed,” he said. That is a reasonable aim, and one that depends entirely on the survey reaching beyond the circles of those who already have strong views on the subject.
When Range Community News raised with Marty’s office the concern that a survey shared primarily through social media risks reflecting the views of a vocal minority rather than the broader community, his office acknowledged the point directly and asked Range Community News to help widen its reach. We are doing exactly that. But we would also encourage readers to approach the survey with the full picture in mind, including what a crossing would actually involve in practice.
The Safety Question: What Does the Data Say?
Any conversation about new safety infrastructure has to start with data. TMR does not fund pedestrian crossings on the basis of community anxiety; it funds them on the basis of crash history and traffic volumes.
On crash history, TMR’s own assessment of the Mapleton K-intersection, that it was ‘low priority’ due to no recorded deaths, suggests that serious pedestrian incidents at this location have been rare. This does not mean no one has had a worrying moment on that road. ‘Near misses’ and moments of anxiety are real, they are simply not captured in official datasets, which only record crashes involving injury or a vehicle requiring towing. The gap between felt danger and recorded danger may be a genuine issue with how TMR’s funding models work, but it is the model that governs whether a crossing gets built.
On traffic volumes, TMR’s publicly accessible data records 1,095 vehicles per day on an Obi Obi Road rural segment measured in 2020 (See Update below). Traffic volumes at the village K-junction itself may be somewhat higher, given that it draws from multiple approach roads. Range Community News has submitted a formal data request to TMR for both the junction-specific traffic count and a ten-year crash history for the village stretch and will publish the confirmed figures as soon as they are received. What we can say with confidence in the meantime is that Mapleton’s traffic volumes are low by any regional comparison, and that TMR’s standard warrant assessments for pedestrian crossings are unlikely to be easily met here.
If you believe the official picture does not reflect the reality on the ground, the survey’s comments section is exactly the right place to say so.
The Paradox of the ‘Dangerous’ Road
There is a well-documented principle in traffic psychology sometimes called ‘risk compensation’: roads that feel uncertain or slightly uncomfortable tend to produce more cautious behaviour from both drivers and pedestrians. The somewhat complex character of Mapleton’s K-intersection may, paradoxically, be performing safety work that a formal crossing could reduce.
When a zebra crossing is installed in a low-volume environment, pedestrians can begin to assume the paint will protect them, stepping out with less vigilance than they would otherwise apply. Drivers, meanwhile, may shift attention from watching for people to processing signage. In village settings, this dynamic can actually increase risk. It is one reason why TMR sometimes declines crossing requests in locations where the existing environment, however imperfect-looking, is producing safe outcomes.
The Trade-Off the Survey Doesn’t Mention: Parking
The survey asks whether you support a crossing ‘to enhance safety.’ Most people will instinctively say yes, who would not want to enhance safety? But the survey does not mention what a crossing would actually cost the community in practical terms.
Under Queensland’s Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), it is illegal to park within 20 metres before a pedestrian crossing and 10 metres after it. That is a mandatory 30-metre ‘no standing’ zone. On a narrow street like Obi Obi Road, where a standard parallel parking space is approximately 6 metres wide, one pedestrian crossing would legally eliminate between five and six on-street parking spaces, most likely those directly in front of the shops and medical centre.
For a village where parking near the doctor’s surgery and library is already stretched, particularly for those who cannot walk far, this is not a trivial trade-off. It deserves to be part of your thinking before you respond to the survey.
The Streetscape Complication
There is one further practical issue worth considering. In 2023, Sunshine Coast Council invested in a streetscape upgrade along the Obi Obi Road shop frontages, new garden beds, seating, bins, bike racks, and resurfaced pavement. Many residents welcomed these improvements to the village’s amenity and character.
A pedestrian crossing installed near this area would likely require the removal or significant pruning of some of that planting, relocation of street furniture, and excavation of the repaved surface to install mandatory tactile ground indicators. TMR’s sight-line requirements for a legal crossing, drivers must have an unobstructed view of a pedestrian from a prescribed approach distance, can directly conflict with trees, shrubs, and benches placed for amenity purposes.
The cost of a basic pedestrian crossing, including all required signage, infrastructure, and accessibility works, is likely to run into the tens of thousands of dollars at minimum, and could exceed $100,000 depending on design requirements. Ratepayers could find themselves funding a project that partially dismantles something they recently asked for and paid to build.
Is There a Middle Path?
Those who feel that current arrangements are insufficient but are concerned about the parking and streetscape implications of a full crossing may wish to consider some alternatives worth raising with Marty Hunt’s office directly, or in person at the mid-April Conversation Station.
‘Pedestrians Ahead’ or ‘Drive with Care Through Our Village’ warning signage, for example, does not carry the legal ‘no standing’ requirements of a formal crossing but prompts driver alertness through the relevant zone. It is considerably less expensive, a matter of hundreds of dollars rather than tens of thousands and requires no change to the physical road or footpath. Similarly, improved gateway treatments at the village entry points could reinforce the 40km/h limit for visiting drivers without altering the character of the street.
The distinction is between infrastructure that changes behaviour through legal obligation and infrastructure that changes behaviour through awareness. In a low-volume village environment, the latter may be both more appropriate and more effective, and it preserves both parking and streetscape in the process.
The Broader Context: Regional Equity
TMR and Sunshine Coast Council are both operating under significant budgetary pressure. Infrastructure funding allocated to a location with a clean safety record is funding not available for roads with documented fatality histories elsewhere in the region. The intersections and road stretches below the range carry traffic volumes many times higher than Obi Obi Road, with a very different crash record.
This is not an argument that Mapleton’s concerns are invalid. It is a reminder that the strongest cases for infrastructure funding are those supported by data, and that responsible community advocacy means understanding where your location sits in a regional picture.
Marty Hunt’s office has confirmed that all community input is welcome, including views that raise the trade-offs discussed in this article. “Community input will play a critical role in building a clear and accurate picture of the situation on the ground,” he said.
Range Community News encourages every resident of Mapleton and Flaxton to complete the survey, but to do so with a full understanding of what different outcomes would mean in practice. If you have direct knowledge of incidents on Obi Obi Road, near misses, difficulties crossing with mobility aids, concerns about school pick-up times, include that detail in the ‘Additional Comments’ field. Anecdotal evidence will not change TMR’s funding model on its own, but specific, first-hand accounts are far more useful to an MP making a case than a simple show of hands.
If you would prefer to have the conversation face to face, keep an eye on Marty Hunt’s social media pages for details of his upcoming Mapleton Conversation Station, scheduled for mid-April.
Update: TMR Data Confirmed
Range Community News has now received a formal response from the Department of Transport and Main Roads.
A Transport and Main Roads spokesperson confirmed: there were no recorded crashes along Obi Obi Road between Emu Walk and the intersection of Obi Obi Road, Flaxton Drive, and Post Office Road, Mapleton, from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2025.
The background data also confirms that annual average daily traffic on the relevant stretch was 1,022 vehicles in 2025, a slight decrease from the 1,095 recorded in 2020. The primary documents governing whether a pedestrian crossing may be installed are the Queensland Guide to Traffic Management (Part 6) and the Austroads Guide to Traffic Management (Part 6).
The confirmed ten-year crash-free record and the modest traffic volumes will be relevant context for any formal assessment under those guidelines. Residents are still encouraged to complete Marty Hunt’s survey and to include first-hand accounts of near misses or accessibility difficulties in the comments field, as that on-the-ground detail remains the most useful supplement to the official data picture.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy and timeliness, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the article or the information contained within for any purpose.